OPINION: Macron’s health passport is an unsung triumph for France

OPINION: Macron's health passport is an unsung triumph for France
Emmanuel Macron has received few garlands for his decision to push the health passport. Photo: Ludovic Marin/AFP
President Emmanuel Macron’s decision to deprive the unvaccinated of fun and long-distance travel has been a triumph – but a largely unsung triumph, writes John Lichfield.

Yes, street protests against the “health pass” persist and grow. Yes, they are continuing in the month of August, traditionally a political no-go-zone.

No, they should not be dismissed, even though three-quarters of the protesters are the usual anti-Macrons and anti-everythings.

READ ALSO Protests over the health passport will continue, but this is not a new ‘yellow vest’ moment 

(article continues below)

See also on The Local:

Demonstrations are ongoing, with more planned for Saturday. Photo by Alain JOCARD / AFP

Let us recall, however, why Macron felt obliged to swallow his words and ask parliament to extend the health pass to restaurants, bars, cafés and long-distance trains and buses almost one month ago.

When he made the announcement on July 12th, the French vaccination programme was flagging. After a slow start and a booming spring and early-summer, first-vaccinations had slumped to less than 170,000 a day.

The fourth “Delta” wave of Covid-19 threatened to cut a swathe through the unvaxxed part of the French population.

The real reason for imposing the health pass was not to “segregate” the vaccinated from the unvaccinated for health reasons. The real reason was not to slow the spread of the Delta variant by making restaurants and bars off-limits to the vax-shy, vax-lazy or vax-resistant.

The health-pass was imposed to re-boot the French vaccine programme. The intention was to jog, force or coerce people to get vaccinated –  to make vaccination not exactly compulsory but essential if you wanted to lead a normal life.

EXPLAINED When and where you need a health passport in France

Let’s leave aside for a moment the political, moral or philosophical arguments against this decision.

In terms of its intended consequences, the health-pass has been an enormous success. Long before it took effect on Monday French people had flocked to vaccination centres or pharmacies or doctors’ surgeries.

Since Macron’s TV address which announced the extension of the pass on July 12th, over 9 million people – 9,345,380 as of Tuesday night – had received first injections against Covid-19. This is an average of 322,275  a day, almost double the rate before Macron spoke.

The daily rate of first doses has slumped again in the last week but is still averaging 280,000 a day. France, as of last night, had first-vaxxed 45,289,566 people over the age of 12  – around 78 percent of adolescents and adults. If you exclude the 12 to 17 year olds, the first-vax rate for French adults is now almost 81 percent.

At the present rate of progress, France will overtake the UK total of first vaccinations in about one week’s time.

The population of the two countries is almost identical at about 67 million.

The UK has given first doses to 47,091,889 people but that is now increasing at a rate of only 32,500 a day. The French total is rising by nine times that daily rate – and  is forecast to increase again from next Monday by  Doctolib, the medical booking site.

I got in trouble with British vaccine nationalists when I first pointed a couple of weeks ago that the French first-vax total was on course to overtake the UK by mid-August. In fact, several other EU countries have since already overtaken Britain in terms of jabs-per-thousand people.

My intention is not to denigrate the UK vax programme which was wonderful in its early months. Britain is still reaping the benefits of having vaccinated so many people so quickly, even if the daily first dose rate has now slowed to a trickle with around one third of British 18-29’s still unvaccinated.

(The French total, it is true, also includes 12 to 17 year olds. But why have adolescents been left unprotected in the UK for so long?)

My reason for making the comparison with the UK are twofold. First to counter the exaggerated attacks on the French and EU vax roll-outs in the UK media earlier this year. Secondly, to demonstrate the “success” of the French health pass.

Most domestic media commentary in France has focused on the Saturday protests. The impact of the health pass  on the vax programme – and the impact of the vax programme on the Covid pandemic – has not been entirely ignored. But its triumphs have been pushed into the background.

The Delta wave is now upon us. The number of cases may already have crested. But acute cases and deaths are still rising sharply. Over 80 percent of the more than 1,500 people now in acute care are unvaccinated.

Two maps published in recent days are worth considering side-by-side. The first (on the left, with the highest incidence rates in purple) by independent website Covidtracker, shows the current incidence rate for the Delta wave, département by département. The second (on the right with the lowest vaccination rates in red), based on a  study for the French health insurance system, shows where the rates of  vaccination in France are highest and lowest.

The match between high-incidence and low-vaccinaton  – all along the Mediterranean coast, in the poorer Paris and Lyon suburbs, in parts of the south west  and a few islands elsewhere – is not exact but it is striking.

Whatever the Saturday marchers may say, vaccination works

Macron made a politically dangerous decision to revive the French vax programme. He may or may not pay a political price for that decision in the presidential elections next April.

He may also benefit. Over 60 percent of French people tell pollsters that they approve of the health pass.

France could reach, on present trends,  90 percent or so of first vaccinated adults by mid-September. If the Delta wave has passed by then, Macron could abandon the health pass (always meant to be short-lived) and announce that it has been a huge success.

What can be stated confidently is that the health pass – and therefore Macron – have already saved many hundreds of French lives.


Member comments

  1. What are the French rules for an American (me) or British (wife) passport holder who is fully vaccinated with an American CDC vaccination certificate, and is a legal resident of Germany? Can they visit France as a tourist? We are retirees living in Germany.

  2. Suffering endless lawsuits, Guo Wengui faces his Black July
    The little tricks of New Gettr and Gclub cannot resist the judicatory storm

    Here comes the big news. The Cheater Guo claims that he will take nine times to testify and appear in the court more than a dozen times In the scorching July.

  3. I consider The Local to do a good job in keeping its readers informed about everyday life for francophones in France and beyond. I assume this counts as “balanced” reporting. John L contributes to this from time to time e.g the day to day effects of the Brexit implementation (shortages in M&S stores!), or his experience of making a long journey in an EV.
    However his piece on President Macron and the vaccination campaign was clearly marked OPINION. This is standard newspaper practice and exposes readers to a deliberately biased point of view to either challenge or support different readers’ views.
    The best way to get a deep and wide range of views to provide the “balance “ you seek is probably to read Le Monde, Liberation, and Le Figaro.
    At least the opening comments from Cathy et al have got us all going on the topic which, in my view., was well spoken for by Lyn McBride. Thanks all 👏

  4. Other world leaders have not needed to coerce people into taking the vaccine because they didn’t undermine the vaccines in the first place.

  5. Hallo kasza.artur
    First of all please avoid personal accusations about my having a ‘preferred number ‘ of people I want to see dead, I don’t want anyone to suffer or die from this disease, I did not bring it into the world, nothing in my comments merits such a personal accusation, I asked only for more balance in reporting. The idea is that IF as a reader you hear many viewpoints THEN you can make up your mind on the issue. So under your argument would you be ok about being forced into other behaviours for the ‘common interests of long-term health for many thousands of people and of survival for some’. Let”s take pollution for example, killing hundreds of thousands of people per year in our own back yard. Happy that the Government removes your car/vehicles and makes you walk? Now what about poverty, inequality, exploitation, lack of education and fresh water, starvation, war…shouldn’t you be forced to give up a percentage of your bank account for the common good? Would you be arguing you should lose your freedom over your money, your body, your possessions, and give it to the State or any other authority to decide what is good for for ‘everyone’ rather than what is good for you? Why are so so keen to do this with vaccines, and only vaccines, what is so special about the human body and confidential medical decisions in the case of vaccines that make it ‘not a matter of individual choice’ for you? Perhaps if you had been exposed to more balanced reporting you would be able to show some sensitivity to people who are not able to accept this vaccine, who see and foresee dangerous precedents in the behaviour of the Government, because you would actually have listened to people and their individual stories, and you would have understood that there are other dangers to human wellbeing than Covid, rather than reducing us all to statistics in a very black and white impoverished view that does not take into account the complex realities of this situation at all.

  6. Cathy, you are speaking of balance, and Liberté, where the reality is far more simple: will it be 120 000 dead, or 130 000, or 150 000, or 180 000, or … . What is your prefered number? Is this the time you want to shout Liberté? Vaccination in this situation is not a matter of individual choice, it is a matter of common interests of long term health for many thousands of people and of survival for some, and getting to a more or less normal life for all of us. I have no understanding or even interest in understanding for those who do not consider that but go out in the street and shout ther Liberté. No room for such sensitivies in this case.

  7. First, we would appreciate relevant comments, not stupid ones. Second, vacciantion is still not compulsory for people other than the medical staff.

  8. Macron has been incredibly brave and courageous in essentially requiring everyone to get the vaccine. And unless you have some medical problems that prevents it, Getting the vaccine is a moral imperative. Individuals who do not get it are endangering others. I salute him and wish other world leaders were just as brave. Thank you for this excellent article.

  9. The journalism we are experiencing during this covid-pandemic is often very one sided, showing how dependent the media is nowadays on being in line with Government, or journalists on being in line with their chief-editors. It’s scary. John Lichfield, as a journalist, should know and try better to stick to journalistic ethics of being somewhat neutral if not critical of what is going on. It’s downright fascism to be discriminating against people the way Governments are doing it right now and journalism should not be advocating this in any way!!!

Become a Member to leave a comment.Or login here.