Traiter” l'homosexualité par l'homéopathie: c'est ce que propose le Dr. Jean-Yves Henry, un médecin généraliste. Il propose d'autres traitements afin de guérir de troubles comme la masturbation ou la jalousie. ?????@AmicaleRefuge @lerefuge @SOShomophobie @stop_homophobie pic.twitter.com/m7JSAikKHE
— A.Heiligenstein☮️? (@aurelien6801) August 14, 2018
Homeopathy granules. Photo: AFP
Regional health minister Mauro Poggia asked a commission overseeing health professionals and patient rights in the canton to open an investigation into the practice of Dr Jean-Yves Henry, he told the Le Courrier daily in an interview.
“For him, it would seem that homosexuality is an illness to cure. This element is enough to justify opening an investigation,” Poggia was quoted as saying.
The decision came after comments began flourishing on social media and then on mainstream media about the doctor and an article he authored in 2009 about homosexuality, which he says is “not a pathology but a special symptom” seen in “border-line” and other patients.
Henry, who is a licenced general practitioner in Geneva and who also has a homoeopathic practice in the neighbouring canton of Vaud, goes on to describe a range of homoeopathic therapies that can be used to remedy this “symptom”, with different methods recommended for boys and girls.
Contacted by Swiss public broadcaster RTS Tuesday, he appeared to double down on that interpretation.
“Homosexuality is a symptom like any other, like having a headache or hay fever. I don't understand what the problem is,” he said.
An undated addendum on the www.medecine-integree.com website where his article was published meanwhile appeared to take issue with the media coverage in recent days, pointing out that homosexuality is one of 64,000 symptoms that Henry and his colleagues evaluate in their work.
The note stressed that the page on homosexuality had first and foremost been aimed at “making our students think about the relationship between medical remedies and behavioural symptoms.”
The Geneva commission has been tasked with examining if opinions expressed by Henry are independent of his medical activity, and whether he has endangered his patients or practised illegal medicine, according to Poggia.